Skip to content

Do I need to have an opinion on every big political issue?

No. Well, not exactly.

I certainly don’t think you need to comment on every big political issue in your manifesto – there just wouldn’t be space for that.

I do think you need to be informed. You need to know what the big, controversial political issues of this term have been. And you need to have some understanding of issues that concern the public, which we haven’t been able to address. Because you will be asked for your views during the campaign period, and you want your answers to be credible.

As a first-timer, you can usually afford to say: “Based on my current understanding, I think X. But I will need more information to make a final decision. This is what I’m going to do to make sure I get that evidence.” (Or, “I think it’s important we hear the voices of the public on this before the States vote. Here’s what I’ll do to make sure there is a meaningful consultation.”)

At least, you can do that in response to questions about “how are we going to fix this?” But you can’t sit on the fence when it comes to general principles. (Well, you can. But it won’t look good on you.)

For one example, take education. The technical question is “what is the right model of secondary education?” You might not be able to give a concrete answer to that. There’s a review and consultation going on – why would you know more than it does? People will want you to have an answer (and, especially, will want you to listen to theirs) but I think you can say “there’s more we need to know before we make a decision.”

But the in-principle question is something along the lines of “would you bring back the 11-plus (or some other form of selection)?” It’s a question about the principle of (non-)selective education. I think it’s reasonable to expect that even first-timers would have a view on that – we have been debating it as a community for generations.

Or, as another example, take drug reform. The technical question is “what should Guernsey’s drug laws look like in future?” The States has committed to look at alternatives to criminal justice for drug use, early in your term of office. So this will probably be a live issue for you. But it’s a complex area where – again – you might want to do more research before you can commit to the right way forward.

But the in-principle question is “do you believe drug use should be a criminal issue or not?” I think people on both sides of the argument will, reasonably, expect to hear a fairly definitive answer to that.

The thing about politics is, once you’re elected, you’ll learn a lot about issues that you’ve never considered before. You might have an instinctive position on something and, once it has been challenged by the evidence, you change your mind. That’s great. Politicians who learn and grow, who consider the evidence and are moved by it, are a wonderful thing. And I think it helps if you acknowledge upfront that you will want to do your research, and you might very well change your mind on some things as you find out more about them.

But I don’t think that should put you off saying anything definitive about anything. If you can’t give a clear answer to any straightforward question, then you won’t be giving voters any substance to latch on to – nothing to show who you really are, or what kind of decisions you are likely to make. I’m not sure fence-sitters are going to do well in this election – I think people are going to need a reason to be enthusiastic about you, to vote for you; and that only happens if you show what you’re made of.

That said, “fence-sitting” is a time-honoured political technique and, to be honest, it works really well for some people. Some voters do accept being fobbed off with waffly non-answers; maybe even enough to get you elected, if your waffle is convincing enough.

As always, I need to qualify what I’ve said here (which boils down to: “know when to give a straight answer, and when to acknowledge there’s more to learn”) is really a personal preference and, while your honesty may win you favour with some voters, it will alienate others. As ever, take what I say with a pinch of salt, and do what feels right for you in your campaign.

Go back to Getting Into Guernsey Politics
Go back to Section 1.2: Getting Elected
Register to Vote

Guernsey’s iconic women of the future?

Thank you for nominating a young woman or girl for our future iconic Guernsey women campaign to celebrate International Women’s Day!

Nominations close on Sunday 6 March at 17.00.

Please fill in the details below.


Miriam Makeba - South Africa

Nominated by: Christine James

Zenzile Miriam Makeba (1932 to 2008), nicknamed Mama Africa, was a South African singer, songwriter, actress, United Nations goodwill ambassador, and civil rights activist. Associated with musical genres including Afropop, jazz, and world music, she was an advocate against apartheid and white-minority government in South Africa. In 2020 she was named one of Time magazine’s 100 women of the century. 

South Africa is ranked 12th in the world for percentage of women in national parliament: 45.8% (source: 

Are you from South Africa? Please email if there is a social or cultural group for people from South Africa in Guernsey.

Want to learn more about public office vacancies in Guernsey? 

Sign up to our newsletter 

The original image “The Hague Jazz 2008 – Miriam Makeba” by Haags Uitburo is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0. 


Jacinda Ardern - New Zealand

Nominated by: Martin Lock

Jacinda Ardern (born 1980) has served as prime minister of New Zealand and leader of the Labour Party since 2017. In 2019, she led the country through the aftermath of the Christchurch mosque shootings, rapidly introducing strict gun laws in response, and throughout 2020 she directed the country’s widely praised response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ardern was the world’s second elected head of government to give birth in office when her daughter was born in 2018. ‘An inspiring Prime Minister who brought a nation together with true leadership, empathy and compassion.’

New Zealand is ranked 4th in the world for percentage of women in national parliament: 48.3% (source: 

Other iconic women: Dame Whina Cooper, nominated by Claire Fisher, and Kate Sheppard, nominated by Anna Cooper.

Are you from New Zealand? You may be interested in joining the ANZACs in Guernsey Facebook group

Want to learn more about public office vacancies in Guernsey? 

Sign up to our newsletter